Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sociology/Archive 9

src: upload.wikimedia.org

Video Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sociology/Archive 9

RfC in Scientific Opinion on Climate Change

Comment on Talk: Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change # RFC_Controversy_about_the_policy_section where the topic is being debated but there are currently some contributors. The RfC was raised by Serten who entered a previous request here. He marks the RfC that appeals to Politics, government, and RfC lists of laws but not lists of Mathematics, science, and RfC technology, and refers as you see in the above comment to those interested in science as a tekkis that may give the idea of ​​a lack of mind meetings there. Dmcq (talk) 16:25, August 27, 2014 (UTC)

Maps Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sociology/Archive 9

TFA nomination notification

In the past, there was a demand that a discussion of potential controversial TFAs be brought to the attention of more than just those with WP: TFAR on their watchlist. With that in mind: Making love: The word Taboo and Protecting our First Amendment Freedom has been nominated for appearance as a Featured Articles Today. If you have any views, please comment on Wikipedia: the latest articles/requests. thanks. - Cirt (talk) 22:16, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

src: i.imgur.com

New article on viral video - From The Doctor to my son Thomas

• From The Doctor to my son Thomas

I have created a new article on viral video. From The Doctor to my son Thomas .

Help or suggestions with additional secondary resources will be appreciated on the article talk page, at Talk: From The Doctor to my son Thomas.

Thanks, - Cirt (talk) 23:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

src: upload.wikimedia.org

Please review Hitachi Magic Wand

As part of the Improvement project, I recently put Hitachi Magic Wand up for Peer Review article.

Participation will be appreciated, on Wikipedia: Peer Review/Hitachi Magic Wand/archive1. - Cirt (talk) 06:20, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

src: thinking.is.ed.ac.uk

No Lifeguard On Off: Accidental Life from the First Supermodel in the World

• No Lifeguard On Off: The Unintentional Life of the World's First Supermodel

I have started a new article in the book by Janice Dickinson - Without Lifeguard On Off: The Unintentional Life of the World's First Supermodel .

Do not hesitate to help with additional secondary sources, and/or take advantage of collaborative discussions in Talk: No Lifeguard Duty: The Unintentional Life of the First Supermodel in the World.

Thanks, - Cirt (talk) 06:39, November 22, 2014 (UTC)

src: upload.wikimedia.org

One of your project articles has been featured

src: leedsunilibrary.files.wordpress.com

Wikipedia: Articles for removal/Agender

Opinions are needed about whether the Agend article should exist or not. Flyer22 (talk) 16:30, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

src: thinking.is.ed.ac.uk

Comment on WikiProject X proposal

Hello! As you know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia are struggling to stay active once they are established. I believe there are many potential WikiProjects to facilitate cross-field collaboration, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will learn what makes WikiProjects successfully defend the editor and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the previous posting error If someone has moved my message to the talk page, feel free to delete this post.) Harej (talk) 22:48, October 1, 2014 (UTC)

src: upload.wikimedia.org

Sociology: student data spotlight

Piotr reminded me that I did not share this here; here's a link to the article we wrote for the ASA Footnotes publication about the great impact of their Wikipedia Initiative so far with the sociology content in WP.

Highlights:

• We have 34 sociology classes participating in our program, and the students in that class edited 967 unique articles. All sociology students say they have contributed 8.76 million bytes of content to Wikipedia.
• We do quality article research in spring 2012, which finds that students increase Wikipedia on average by 88 percent.

You can see more at: http://www.asanet.org/footnotes/septoct14/wikipedia_0914.html#sthash.Jt81C5ie.duf

We have two more articles coming out in the Future Footage, one from the professors talking about their experience and one on how to join the initiative.

Eryk (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:39, October 22, 2014 (UTC)

@Eryk (Ed Wiki): : Incredible, again. Is it possible to view pages (meta?) Where are the data for this quality study, as well as a list of courses and articles, presented? - _{Piotr Konieczny aka Proconsul Piotrus | reply here} 05:32, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

src: upload.wikimedia.org

One of your project articles has been featured

Article Editing Sociology: A guide for students and instructors

Hello! I am a new Associate of Communication for Wiki Education Foundation. We are in the process of developing an initial draft of an advisory brochure for instructors and students on Sociology articles on Wikipedia, and how to contribute and improve them effectively. We've done this before for psychology - you can see the results of that effort here.

I look forward to hearing from regular contributors to articles related to sociology. What would you tell a new student, or Wikipedian, to help them start editing sociology topics? Any suggestions on editing in this field are welcome, especially with regard to specific sociological issues, such as finding a good candidate article for improvement, what is a good (and bad) source, and what kind of topic heading should be avoided. Any other topic or idea is accepted.

I will post a draft for review once we have an idea of ​​the shape needed - for now, I am gathering feedback and ideas from the community to guide it. Feel free to contact me here or on my talk page!

Eryk (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:47, October 17, 2014 (UTC)

@Eryk (Ed Wiki): : This is a great initiative. You may want to see what you can take from my long (too long...) introductory page such as Wikipedia: School and university/User: Piotrus/Fall 2011 project, tailored for sociology students. Important Introduction, Duties and Tips may be of interest to you. And inviting them to see WikiProject is a good idea too. - _{Piotr Konieczny aka Proconsul Piotrus | reply here} 05:31, October 23, 2014 (UTC)

I have seen the advice offered by Piotrus and have worked on several aspects of the current design. Everyone is welcomed and encouraged to read the draft here. We look forward to feedback from the community. Ideally, we will collect suggestions and make revisions on December 1st. Thank you to all of you! Eryk (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:23, November 21, 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Academia?

Please take a look here: Wikipedia: WikiProject Council/Proposals/Academia. thanks. Fgnievinski (talk) 18:40, November 24, 2014 (UTC)

Open Access Readers, tools to find the missing academic citation

Hi, I'm working on a project to find important missing academic quotes from Wikipedia, which I think might be useful for Wikiproject. This is just proof of concept now, but if you have any ideas or feedback, it will be helpful at this early stage. Take a look: Open Access Reader.

EdSaperia (bicara) 13:20, 9 Desember 2014 (UTC)

Bantuan dengan dua artikel?

I will post this on some applicable WikiProjects, so my apologies for cut and paste. I do not really see the purpose in writing a new one for every WP. In any case, I need help refining the article for Gender Ads, a book by Goffman. Long story short, this article was made by a group of students who were sent here with apparently no instruction or education about Wikipedia and wrote an encyclopedia article, so the page has standard problems: original research, bad sources, tone. I've done enough to show where the book will be famous, but the page needs to be refined to focus on the book's influence on others and the basic outline. I'm not too familiar with this job, so it would be better for someone familiar with the job to edit the page. I think students might see basic articles for gender ads, who have similar issues (but better sources), and imitate their pages afterwards and after the outline of the student paper type. Both articles can use some of the work of intelligent editors, if one is ready for the challenge. I have cleaned up the worst in the book article and threw some sources into, so that's what happened to it. Tokyogirl79 (?????) 01:00, December 12, 2014 (UTC)

Request a review

Draft: The IPCC consensus is about the social science that says about the topic, so I invite reviewers from Sociology WikiProject to see it. Regards Serten II (talk) 18:39, December 19, 2014 (UTC)

The white savior narration in the movie

Sociological article narrative of the black and white interpreter in the film has been prepared for removal: Wikipedia: Articles for the removal/narration of the White rescuers in the film. Thanks, ErikÃ, (talkÃ, | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 02:57, December 20, 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment in Talk: White supremacy

There is a request for comment in Talk: White supremacy. It concerns the opening phrase of leads. 86,170,130,156 (talk) 02:11, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Simple talk: Articles for making/Theory of Conversion Minority Influence

Hello, sociologist. This old AfC submission will soon be removed as stale. Is this an important topic that should be maintained and improved? --Anne Delong (talk) 03:28, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

It seems important, and a major improvement from our existing minority Conversion theory affects where it should be combined (and moved to Conversion theory only). - _{Piotr Konieczny aka Proconsul Piotrus | reply here} 12:41, January 8, 2015 (UTC)

Agreement is important. If nobody else does it first, I might be able to do a merge & amp; moving any time in February. Meclee (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I have delayed its removal for six months, so you can spend some time... --Anne Delong (talk) 00:02, January 9, 2015 (UTC)

Streisand discussion of category removal categories

1. Category: Streisand effects
2. Wikipedia: Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_March_12 # Category: Streisand_effect

Category: Streisand effects have been nominated for deletion, discussion exists on Wikipedia: Category_for_discussion/Log/2015_March_12 # Category: Streisand_effect.

Feel free to participate there.

Thank you for your time,

- Cirt (bicara) 02:11, 17 Maret 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject X sedang ditayangkan!

Hello all!

You may have received a message from me previously asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we focused on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProject: good, bad, or neutral. We're also looking for WikiProjects who may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participation easier and projects more manageable. If you or WikiProject you are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be prompted to change anything that goes against its wish. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia: WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, January 14, 2015 (UTC)

Proposal of Trust Confidence (social sciences)

Some time ago I proposed merging Trustworthiness to Trust (social sciences). There is some discussion about it, but not a great response. It might be safe to combine it, and I would if no one else responded immediately, but I thought I would bring it to the attention of anyone who was interested, so I posted a notice on the related WikiProject talk page. Cheers, Ã, Discant X 21:12, February 8, 2015 (UTC)

Taking into account the sad state of trust, I see no reason to refuse. If/when the subject is expanded, it can be separated again. - _{Piotr Konieczny aka Proconsul Piotrus | reply here} 14:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Superdiversity

I am writing an article about Superdiversity. Please help me make it better if you can. BrumEduResearch (talk) 11:40, February 22, 2015 (UTC)

Userbox Sociology updated

For information, I am updating {{Expert Sociology users}} to cover up to 3 specializations. View the template page for usage and examples. Eve RGR een Fir (talk) Please {{return} } 19:56, February 23, 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Ed "Women's Editing Study" brochure: requested feedback

Hello everyone, Wiki Ed will distribute leaflets for the Women Studies course in the United States and Canada that edit Wikipedia as part of their class assignment. It will also be available on-wiki and as pdf for anyone to read or use. I hope to get feedback on the contents of the brochure - if anyone has time to check it out, I have uploaded the Wiki draft here. We want to print it before March 3, so feedback will be very useful before that. Thank you to all of you! Eryk (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:21, February 25, 2015 (UTC)

Writing new articles about illegal immigrants: feedback received

My name is Katherine and I am currently a senior who attends Rice University. I intend to write a new Wikipedia page titled "The availability of health services for illegal immigrants," which I think this page will serve as a great parent article. In this new article I intend to include four main sections as follows: introduction/background, use of health care services, barriers to accessing health care systems, and relevant federal and state level policies. Under each of these main sections, except for the introduction, there will also be at least one sub-section associated with a particular population, such as women or specific data found on the topic. This proposed donation is also part of the course I take for my children on poverty, justice, and human ability. Feel free to offer thoughts, suggestions, and suggestions! Katcai02 (talk) 19:40, February 25, 2015 (UTC)

Simple School Invitation Wikipedia

Hi all. On behalf of the team behind the research project Wikipedia Primary School , I would like to announce that articles Sexism - Domestic Violence - Gender stereotypes , which appeal to this wikiprosek, was chosen some time ago for review by external experts. We now want to request editors interested in joining our efforts and fixing articles before March 15, 2015 (any time zone) to their liking; revisions will be sent to the designated experts for review (for details, please refer to the respective article's talk page). Any records and comments written by external experts will be available on the article talk page under the CC-BY-SA license as soon as possible, so you can read it, discuss it and then decide whether and how to use it. Please sign up here to let us know that you are collaborating. Thank you very much for your support! Elitre (WPS) (talk) 17:33, March 1, 2015 (UTC)

Separate discussion notices for Counterculture 1960s

There is a proposal to divide the long time into his own articles, thereby reducing some of the great size of this article. Please join the discussion here. Stevie is the guy! ^{Talk o Work} 21:15, March 2, 2015 (UTC)

Workplace harassment

I plan to move the Workplace harassment page to the "Harassment in the Workplace in the United States" page, as the current page focuses only on the United States and I also plan to contribute content that is specific to the US. If you have any other suggestions on how I can move the article better, please let me know.

In addition to moving articles, I plan to remove some sections, such as "Responsibility" and "Productivity", and add new sections, such as "Definition", "Victim", "Impact", and "Prevention". I'm sure such changes on the page will make navigating the page easier and allowing content to be more specific. Also, I plan to expand significantly the reference section with more scientific sources.

I would appreciate any help with the article. I'm also open to suggestions, so please let me know if there's anything I can do better. Thank you!

Lindaticket (talk) 14:52, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

@Lindaticket: Looking at this article, I think you do not need to move it, it's pretty generic. You may have to write harassment at work in the United States from scratch. See also Harassment in the UK for layouts that are so similar to related topics. - _{Piotr Konieczny aka Proconsul Piotrus | reply here} 03:56, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

@Piotrus: : Hi, Piotrus. Lindaticket also left a note on the Talk: Harassment in the workplace and the response was that it would be better to leave the matter in the article than to start a subartikel. I think as long as the material in the current article is left in place (it was pretty generic, as you say), up Lindaticket which he prefers to do - start a new article or expanding old ones. FYI, I support the registered Lindaticket course. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:48, March 11, 2015 (UTC)

One of the projects you have featured articles

Large-scale changes to some articles

Recently there have been massive refactors of egocentrism articles, compliance (human behavior) and minority influence, at least some of which are within the scope of this project. Similar changes in other articles, egocentric bias, returned by JorisvS with an edit summary of "rv: too much bad quality editing". I therefore draw attention to other edits as well, so you can ensure the quality of this article is not compromised. Regards, Samsara 02:19, April 6, 2015 (UTC)

Superdiversity and WP: NEO

The expert input is asked into this discussion on whether the superdiversity article violates WP: NEO. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:51, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

Sociology of scientific ignorance

Can some people see this new article? This study/research area is unknown to me. L iz ^{Read! Talk!} 11: 54, May 26, 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Yes, this is valid. Articles are a great start, despite further development & amp; reference is required. Thank you, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Restavec is listed in Requested Movement

The requested resettlement discussion has started for Restavec being moved to Restavek. This page appeals to WikiProject and interested members may wish to participate in the discussion here. --RMCD bot 22:48, May 28, 2015 (UTC)

List of people with most of the children enrolled in Request requested

The requested resettlement discussion has already begun for the List of people with most children moved to the List of persons with the number of children. This page appeals to WikiProject and interested members may wish to participate in the discussion here. --RMCD bot 23:16, May 28, 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride

Let's join the slums and slums

See my reasons on Talk: Slum # Merge_with_shanty_town. Since almost two weeks have passed without comment, I would appreciate if the members of this project (whose articles are within the scope) will see this. - _{Piotr Konieczny aka Proconsul Piotrus | reply here} 01:24, June 3, 2015 (UTC)

One of your project articles has been featured

Two of your project articles have been selected for improvement!

butuh bantuan dengan bagian

In Institutional racism, it should repeat the section on Canada due to editing wars with other editors about the source. Looking for an editor to collaborate on the part of Canada with... Robco311 (talk) 18:47, July 2, 2015 (UTC)

Ethnometodology

I have begun to revise this article to try to fulfill the remarkable criticism. I am currently responsible for the latest version of the first two paragraphs, but will do the rest. If anyone wants to help (at least to read and check it makes sense), you are very welcomed. Jalfro 11:28, August 16, 2015 (UTC) - Ã, Introduction to unsigned comments added by Jalfro (talk o contribs)

Packaging income/survival strategy

Hi, I am interested in seeing Wikipedia's coverage of the concept of "income packaging," defined by Hetling, Kwon, and Mahn (2014) as "collecting cash and non-cash resources from various sources... a common financial defensive strategy among earners low [people] "(from abstracts). (1) Looking for feedback if this should be a subheading in an existing article (eg, poverty) or a new article? You can reply to me here or post on my talk page if you have any thoughts! Very much appreciated. Melody.waring (talk) 16:29, August 19, 2015 (UTC)

(1) HETLING, A., JINWOO, K., & amp; MAHN, E. (2014). Economic Income Income Strategies Income and Its Implications for Social Policy and Practice. Journal of Sociology & amp; Social Welfare, 41 (3), 85-113.

• Hi, Melody. You can review WP: NOTABILITY, including WP: PAGEDECIDE, to help answer your questions. WP: NOTDIC may also be relevant. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 20:22, August 19, 2015 (UTC)

Propose a change to the sociology navbox

View Discussion framework: Sociology # Change to footer? RockMagnetist (talk) 19:41, September 7, 2015 (UTC)

Help with articles?

I wonder if anyone can help with Paddywhackery article. I think it may be under sociological guidance because it is part of the culture, but I would be wondering in other WP as well. Tokyogirl79 (?????) 04:28, October 6, 2015 (UTC)

Blacks Encyclopedia of Sociology

Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, Edited by: George Ritzer, eISBN: 9781405124331, Print publication date: 2007, DOI: 10.1111/b.9781405124331.2007.x http://www.sociologyencyclopedia.com

If anyone knows how I can access this, please let me know. This will be very useful for my planned article on sociology, and perhaps, a useful tool for the whole project here. - _{Piotr Konieczny aka Proconsul Piotrus | reply here} 06:05, October 6, 2015 (UTC)

Hi Piotrus, you can try searching through WorldCat. Here's the URL: Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology Online . Good luck! DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 09:36, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

will edit the Leader-Members Exchange Theory

I plan to edit the Leadership-member exchange form page. This is the sandbox I'll be working on, if anyone has any suggestions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alinenaroditsky/sandbox/leadermemberexchangetheory Alinenaroditsky (talk) 00:58, October 12, 2015 (UTC)

Submission afC

View Draft: Retroduction. Thanks, FoCuS contribs ; talk to me! 11:53, October 14, 2015 (UTC)

Cleans all GA's backlog for Sociology

1. Thank you all to all of our editors who helped contribute to quality improvement efforts on Wikipedia regarding WP: SOCIOLOGY.
2. I have helped remove all GA review reviews for Sociology, which can be found on Wikipedia: Nomination of good articles/topic lists/Social sciences and society.
3. I want to suggest here, optional, for you to consider:
4. Suggestions: These suggestions are optional only, but I ask you to at least read up on the Good Articles review instructions and consider review two to three (2-3) GA candidates from a good article nomination, for each (1) you nominated. Again, this is optional and just suggestions only, but please familiarize yourself at least by way of reviewing, then think about it.

Thank you,

- Cirt (talk) 23:09, October 14, 2015 (UTC)

Not in Front of Child - in Peer Review

I have asked Peer Review for Not in Front of Kids .

Feedback will be appreciated, in Wikipedia: Peer Review/Not in Front of Child/archive1 .

Thank you,

- Cirt (bicara) 06:03, 19 Oktober 2015 (UTC)

Dari The Doctor to my son Thomas - kandidat artikel unggulan

I have nominated an article about the video From The Doctor to my son Thomas for Choice Articles considerations.

This article is about a message sent from actor Peter Capaldi in a character in his role as Doctor at Doctor Who, to entertain an autistic young child for the sadness of his grandmother's death.

Comments will be appreciated, in Wikipedia: Candidate of Featured articles/From The Doctor to my son Thomas/archive1 .

Thank you for your time,

- Cirt (bicara) 01:06, 20 Oktober 2015 (UTC)

Scientific American sumber/prevalensi data kekerasan domestik pada artikel Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga

Opinions are needed for the following: Talk: Domestic violence # Should "the level of violence in American households roughly equal between men and women" be included? A WP: Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 (talk) 06:00, October 23, 2015 (UTC)

Gender gender in Jimbo Wales & amp; in Sign Board

FYI:

• Jimbo Wales talk page
• Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
• "Wikipedia's hostility towards women"
• One year of GamerGate, or how I learned to stop worrying and love the level of government consensus Ottawahitech (talk) 12:40, October 28, 2015 (UTC)
  • @Ottawahitech: Not news for me, but thanks for ping. Look at this and [1] (reviewers are very slow...). - _{Piotr Konieczny aka Proconsul Piotrus | reply here} 08:29, October 29, 2015 (UTC)
    • Thank you for replying, Piotrus. I'm glad that my post is not considered "spam" because it seems to be in Wikiproject Women, where it's not even crumbling, but just deleted. Ottawahitech (talk) 12:04, October 29, 2015 (UTC)

Nominated Movie list that features a whitewashed role for deletion

Discussion is underway on whether the article List of movies featuring white-painted roles is suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia according to Wikipedia policies and guidelines or whether it should be removed.

This article will be covered on Wikipedia: Article for deletion/List of movies featuring white-painted roles until consensus is reached, and anyone can contribute to the discussion. Candidates will explain the policies and guidelines of concern. Discussions focus on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users can edit articles during discussion, including to improve articles to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not delete the article-to-article deletion notification from the top of the article. ErikÃ, (talkÃ, | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 14:25, February 22, 2016 (UTC) Burial Ground

Burial Ground's main subject and topic is under discussion, see the talk: Burial Ground (Grave album) - 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

"Slow Science"

The naming of Slow Science is under discussion, see Talk: Slow Science - 70.51.200.135 (talk) 07:16, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

"Fan"

The main usage and topic of the fans are being discussed, see the talk: mechanical fan - 70.51.200.135 (talk) 06:22, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Please visit and help

Hello friends. The following article can actually use some neutral input:

• State and intelligence, (talk)
• Race and intelligence, (talk)
• Richard Lynn, (talk)

Many, many, many, and I mean many thanks. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:46, January 8, 2016 (UTC)

relevant Wikipedia Visiting learners opportunities

Interestingly for this WikiProject member, Rollins College is looking to sponsor Wikipedia Visiting Scholar to upgrade Wikipedia articles on development, urbanization, and tourism in the Southern United States; the relationship between American literature and feminist thought, desegregation, the civil rights movement, environmentalism, or political activism; or the relationship between South and Cuba, especially in higher education.

The San Francisco University Gleeson Library is looking to sponsor Wikipedia Visiting Scholar to improve articles on social justice reformers and the reform movement.

This is a great way to gain access to university library databases and other resources while making an impact in areas you may have donated. For more information, including an overview of library resources, see the College Rollins Visitor Visit page or USF Visiting Scholars page. thanks. --Ryan (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:15, January 14, 2016 (UTC)

Social justice fighters - move the discussion

Tell this WikiProject talk page as an article relevant to the topic

There is ongoing moving discussion associated with this WikiProject.

1. Articles = Social justice fighters
2. Move discussions on Talk: Social_justice_warrior # Requested_move_6_April_2016 .

Feel free to comment as you please.

Thank you,

- Cirt (bicara) 02:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Bulan Sejarah Wanita di seluruh dunia online edit-a-thon

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Unsubscribe, Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)
--Ipigott (talk) 08:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Reissue: Pandering

In an article for Pandering, this phrase, "An example of a pandering is Hillary Clinton's statement that marriage is a bond between a man and a woman in 2004. While in 2015, Hillary Clinton adopted a position of supporting gay marriage to gain support in the political landscape. [2] ", I believe is a reflection of the perception of the author of Clinton's actions. The author considers Clinton's act as Pandering as fact, but in this context I do not accept the author's example for Pandering as valid. That this is also part of Sociology, humans really educate themselves, gain enlightenment, and have a change of heart throughout their lives on various social or political issues (I personally are examples). Therefore, I believe the Pandering author's example should be deleted or altered because this is more of an example of political bias than the fact of Pandering. Maybe using a hypothetical candidate would be best. Full disclosure... I am not a supporter of Hillary Clinton.Wallee27 (talk) 16:16, February 1, 2016 (UTC)

Anti-psychiatry

I clicked and found myself in the Anti-psychiatry page and... it was a mess. I do not know anything about antipsychiatry, but the blatant character attack and POV impulse like a big red flag, so I start checking the source and nothing I've checked so far has to do with antipsychiatry. I got the sense from the discussion that there is a lot of bad information that supports the idea of ​​psychiatry coming from Scientology. Their beliefs do have a place in the article... but with the right source and NPOV. There are other POV's being pushed as well. It turned out to be a very controversial topic. Now after I read a bit about it, it's actually quite interesting. But cleaning the article will be a lot to overcome... so I post this on wikiprojects that are relevant to the expectations of others may also be interested and want to help. :) I have already started a discussion about it in Talk: Anti-psychiatry/Archive 8 # Source. Thank you! Permstrump (talk) 19:23, February 19, 2016 (UTC)

^{I believe it is marked for WP: SOCIOLOGY because "antipsychiatry" refers to a motion, more or less. Permstrump (talk) 19:23, 19 February 2016 (UTC)}

Duplication in articles about blood ties, incest, etc.

Participants in this project may be interested in the discussion I had (hopefully) starting on the WikiProject Law talk page. J.Ã, D.Ã, Crutchfield Ã, | Speaking 17:56, March 23, 2016 (UTC)

Looking for problem references? The Wikipedia Library is proud to announce...

Alexander Street Press (ASP) is an electronic academic database publisher. The collection of "Online Academic Videos" includes videos in various subject areas, including news programs (mainly shows like 60 minutes), music and theater, lectures and demonstrations, and documentaries. Online Academic Videos: The premium collection will be useful for researching topics related to science, history, music and dance, anthropology, business, counseling and therapy, news, nursing, drama, and more. For more details see their website.

There are up to 30 one year ASP accounts available to Wikipedians through this partnership. To apply for free access, go to WP: ASP . Applause! {{u | Checkingfax}} Ã, {Talk} 06:57, March 25, 2016 (UTC)

Page Talk for Change Theory?

First I apologize if this is not the right place for this discussion (I'm not a frequent editor on Wikipedia).

I came to Theory of Change page, which is part of Project Sociology, and needs attention. While this topic is in my academic field of study, I do not want to make changes without a page of talks first. However, nothing seems to set - and I'm not sure to do that. Can someone help?

There are three concerns I have on the page: (1) it reads like a given pseudo-advertorial basically referencing one primary source. (2) is not written from a neutral point of view because it is very positive of the method, and does not present alternative ideas (and Theory of Change is not perfect) and (3) at least one reference [# 14] is not even related to the content as shown. It looks like very random inclusion for any reason.

If someone can help organize the talk page, I'm happy to help improve the page. Mari370 (talk) 17:11, March 28, 2016 (UTC)

I added a talk page tag that provides a link to start a new topic on the The Change conversation page. I also suggest proposing page redirects to change the title of the article into something more descriptive like "Theory of social change" or "Theory of change (sociology)." Warmest regards, Meclee (talk) 17:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Differences between civil movement organizations, communities, and social movements

If we have experts in social movements and related topics, feedback will be most welcome on Wikipedia: Category_for_discussion/Log/2016_April_4 # Category: Civic_and_political_organizations and Talk: Community_organization # Requested_move_6_April_2016. - _{Piotr Konieczny aka Proconsul Piotrus | reply here} 04:44, May 1, 2016 (UTC)

Globalization category

Due to the inter- and multi-disciplinary nature inherent in the topic of Globalization, there are many intersections with the corresponding WikiProject categories. Currently, comments will be welcomed with the proposed name Category: Sociocultural globalization (main aspects and level 2 of the Globalization category) on Wikipedia: Category_for_discussion/Log/2016_May_28 # Category: Sosiocultural_globalization. Thank you in advance. Regards, Meclee (talk) 14:58, May 29, 2016 (UTC)

RfC Notice: montage of individual facial images on ethnic and other demonic articles

Please participate in the discussion on Wikipedia speaking: Manual Style/Picture # Proposed revocation WP: NOETHNICGALLERIES. This is a proposal to vacate the previous consensus reached in the RfC of February 2016 that resulted in the creation of MOS: provision of NOETHNICGALLERIES in MOS: IMAGES, and also thematically related to Wikipedia: Village Pump (policy)/Archive 127 # RfC: Ethnicity in infobox (all discussions it's ultimately about using infoboxes to identify individuals as ethnic members, and this is also related to MOS: IDENTITY). - SMcCandlish ? ? Ã, Â ¢? ^? ?? _? ? ^? ? 17:24, May 29, 2016 (UTC)

An interesting discussion for this project...

... can be found in Talk: Prostitution # Sin. BMK (talk) 18:26, May 30, 2016 (UTC)

Moving Genderqueer articles to Non-binary genders

Opinions are required on the following: Talk: Genderqueer # Requested to move June 4, 2016. A WP: Permalink for it is here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Help with articles?

I will post this in several different areas, but I wonder if anyone can help with the draft: Rape concept. I think this can be independently stand out outside the culture of rape, but the draft takes a lot of work and it will have a better chance of holding back surveillance (because let's face it, it gets a lot of checks once it's accepted) if we have multiple editors who do it. Anyone interested? Tokyogirl79 (?????) 05:45, June 14, 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject: Bullying

Halo!

I just wanted to tell you about Proposals for Bullying WikiProject. If you have comments on this issue, use my talk page or use the proposal page. Thank you,

East Anglian Regional (talk) 09:58, June 19, 2016 (UTC)

Find feedback about tools in the Visual Editor to add open license text from other sources

Hello, all

I'm designing a tool for Visual Editor to make it easier for people to add open license text from other sources, there are a large number of open source licenses compatible with Wikipedia including about 9000 journals. I can see enormous opportunities to easily create high quality articles with high volume quickly. I have done a small project with open license text from UNESCO as proof of concept, any thoughts, feedback or support (on Meta page) will be highly appreciated.

thank you

- John Cummings (talk) 14:54, June 28, 2016 (UTC)

Narration of the white storyteller in the movie and The Matrix

There is a request for comment going on whether or not to include The Matrix in the movie list in the black-and-white narrative of the movie. The RfC can be seen here: Talk: White rescue narration in the movie # Inclusion The Matrix. Editor invited to comment. ErikÃ, (talkÃ, | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 18:09, July 13, 2016 (UTC)

Racism in South Korea

Hello, I hope I can contact someone here to see more about Racism articles in South Korea.

There is a dispute about the use of webblog and notation of an event. More on Talk: Racism in South Korea # Weblog Reliability and you can see also some small notes in "history". It would be better to get more opinions because this article is mainly protected by one user. The problem is there is a bar owner in Seoul who keeps a record in his bar that because of Ebola, he will not let the blacks. She apologized four days later, saying, it was because of her poor English skills and the beer. I find this event very insignificant for an article like this. It's as famous as local murder. Perhaps a poor comparison, but still, should not be in this article. And maybe you can also give your opinion about the use of webblog. thanks. --Christian140 (talk) 08:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

PS: Actually, I have more problems with articles that have absolutely no scientific approach. This article basically builds news reports. However, I think news reports are only valid for articles on current events, video games, movies and people. However, articles on racism and discrimination must follow sociological research. In addition, unlike the United States, which has been a fusion since its inception, South Korea is a homogeneous nation. So, research seems to be new in the early stages too, making knowledge based on even more invalid news papers, I think. In addition, I think when the article was named "racism in South Korea" it must follow the definition of Racism. In fact, if the wikipedia author does not evaluate the event on its own, it is original research . However, the article also has a section on Discrimination against North Korean defectors. In my opinion, racism and discrimination are not the same. Therefore, some may claim that this section is not included in the article.

Doing an article like "racism in South Korea" is a lot of effort. Basically because it's not a textbook topic like let's say Product Innovation Charter, where you can find the basic theoretical introduction in the book and get very specific literature from the database. So my approach to starting an article like this is to find an international ranking/index that follows a scientific approach to get country comparison. Instead someone can search the literature review to get art status and find some more articles about databases like Google Scholar or ScienceDirect. I can not see how the source article can provide information about such a thing, in terms of South Korea, and certain research areas. --Christian140 (talk) 08:11, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

@ Christian140: You are mostly right. The article is in bad shape, full of anecdotal examples based on low-quality sources (blogs). Now, news can sometimes be used to fill such articles, so I would not say all the news sources should be deleted, but such articles should be based on academic sources first (and it does exist). To be honest, this article - given its sensitive topic - is not far from the WP candidate: TNT, as it appears to be written almost like harsh words, in a journalistic-like style, much more encyclopaedic. Stories about bars ([2]) can be saved, but not as pictures/captions are placed weird. I think the quotes from the ambassador are relevant, and can be reported in the article, but the trivial case of the bar itself is not really worth mentioning, except in the context of quoting the ambassador who commented on racism in Korea. PS. Regarding searching for sources, I also recommend using Google Books. PPS. I see you nominate it for AfD on Wikipedia: Articles for abolition/racism in South Korea and I choose to stay. Well, after looking into it again I think that the article can be saved, but half if not more than the content may have to go. Unfortunately, I do not have time to dissect it now. - _{Piotr Konieczny aka Proconsul Piotrus | reply here} 08:53, August 22, 2016 (UTC)

@Piotrus: Thank you for your comment. Unfortunately I also do not have time to import the article. But at least the most "silly" information should go and it is also a matter that Spacecowboy "protects" the article, making constructive improvements almost impossible. Users also have a very questionable editing history. Unfortunately, the article was not on the watch list of many other users. The ambassador's opinion may be relevant, but I will not mention the bar more than likely like: "The Kenyan ambassador took a position in an incident at a bar in Itaewon on the topic of racism in Korea He stated that the problem of racism is very deep.". I mean, the focus should clearly lie in the ambassador while the bar show is not important but just "trigger" a statement. Consider there are ten thousand bars in Seoul and the owners make a mark not to let black people due to Ebola and remove them an hour later, apologize and say it because of bad English. The owner is not even a public figure. --Christian140 (talk) 09:17, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Literature

Discussion is underway with a long analysis of the Piotrus Proconsulue here: Talk: Racism_in_South_Korea # Problems_with_citations . Furthermore, I propose to place {{TNT}} in the head of the article. I do not have time and will not edit wikipedia further English. Spacecowboy420 constantly represses and accuses me of being offended by disagreeable opinions. Although, every editing and change I make in the article, I justify the length on the summary and on the talk page, but it is immediately returned by the user. If another user made the same change, he did not return it. Although my proposal is supported by other users, he does not accept it. He seems to have a personal problem with me because I have less edits than he does on enWP. Well, English wikipedia is not a wiki in my home and I just want to raise awareness for articles that are biased, not well-sourced. Unfortunately, it did not work. I will leave the literature collected by Piotrus and I expand it, here.

The next quote problem, for reference only

Also, of course there are more citation issues with that article. In the "work discrimination" section, he states "even with Irish expatriates suffering some discrimination, with South Koreans viewing them as stereotypes as drunks." This is not in the content of the quote [3], nor on the second page. However, with googling you can find something in the east [4]. However, this is a single incident, so you can not conclude that "South Koreans see them stereotypically".

In addition, he stated "Many employers in South Korea often request photos as part of a job application, to facilitate the employers' process of engaging in racist discrimination." This sounds like the reason for photo apps is to differentiate other races. However, their reason comes from history of course. Application procedures vary from country to country, and in some places, ordinary photographs and in other countries do not. However, there is a risk that photos make disseminating applications easier. The statement is biased.

In the "Marriage and relationship" section. "International partners are often forced to leave South Korea because most South Koreans are strongly opposed to relations between South Korea and foreigners." The source can only be found after the following sentence. It's about a soccer player, who left Korea with his wife. [5] There is no general statement, still, here on wikipedia it is described as if this is a often case.

One might also note the conditions in which the article was made, with the lead author stating: "It is disappointing that the article is so small, given the vast nature of racism in South Korea, I will try to expand this article a little." It is also very dangerous for the neutrality of an article, writing with a biased opinion.

Starting from the beginning seems reasonable. --Christian140 (talk)

• Ryuko Kubota; Angel M.Y. Lin (2 June 2009). Race, Culture, and Identity in Second Language Education: Exploring Critical Practices Involved . Routledge. p.Ã, 56. ISBNÃ, 978-1-135-84569-8.
• Shin Gi Wook (November 1, 2012). "South Korean Racist? Diverse but intolerant of diversity". In Rotem Kowner; Walter Demel. Race and Racism in Modern East Asia: Western and Eastern Constructions . BRILL. p.Ã, 369. ISBNÃ, 90-04-23729-1.
• Rotem Kowner; Walter Demel (April 23, 2015). Race and Racism in Modern East Asia: Interaction, Nationalism, Gender and Genealogy . BRILL. pp.Ã, 242-. ISBN: 978-90-04-29293-2.
• Uk Heo; Terence Roehrig (June 28, 2010). South Korea Since 1980 . Cambridge University Press. pp.Ã, 76-. ISBN 978-0-521-76116-1.
• Watson, I. (2012), Paradoxical Multiculturalism in South Korea. Asian Politics & amp; Policy, 4: 233-258. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-0787.2012.01338.x
• Campbell, E. (2015), End of ethnic nationalism? Changed the concept of national identity and ownership among South Korean youth. The Nation of Natl, 21: 483-502. doi: 10.1111/nana.12120
• Kim, Sookyung (2012), Racism in the global era: Analysis of Korean media discourse around migrants, 1990-2009. Community Discourse November 2012 vol. 23 not. 6, 657-678.
• Durham & amp; Carpenter (2014), Multiculturalism face in Korea: Media ritual as framing in news coverage about Jasmine Lee. Journalism November 2015 vol. 16 no. 8, P. 975-992.
• Watson, I. (2010), Multiculturalism in South Korea: Critical Assessment. Contemporary Journal Asia, Page 337-346.
• Lee, Incho (2009), Located Globalization and Racism: Analysis of Buk

  Source of the article : Wikipedia